|
 |
| CASE REPORT |
|
| Year : 2014 | Volume
: 5
| Issue : 1 | Page : 218-221 |
|
|
Dens invagination: A review of literature and report of two cases
Seema Thakur1, Narbir S Thakur2, Manmohan Bramta3, Mohit Gupta4
1 Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, H.P. Government Dental College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
2 Department of Oral Pathology, H.P. Government Dental College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, H.P. Government Dental College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
4 Private Practitioner Orthodontist, Jammu, India
| Date of Web Publication | 18-Feb-2014 |
Correspondence Address:
Seema Thakur
Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, H.P. Government Dental College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.127341
 Abstract | | |
Dens invaginatus occurs as a result of the invagination of the enamel organ. These cases may present difficulties with respect to its diagnosis and treatment because of canal morphology. It frequently leads to caries, pulpal, and periodontal involvement with necrosis and loss of attachment. The knowledge of classification and anatomical variations of teeth with dens invaginatus are of great importance for correct treatment. This article presents two case reports of two different types of dens invaginatus along with profound review of the literature regarding etiology, epidemiology, and histology. It discusses clinical appearance and diagnosis, and it provides guidelines for decision-making and treatment of invaginated teeth. Keywords: Case reports, classification, dens invaginatus, Etiology
How to cite this article:
Thakur S, Thakur NS, Bramta M, Gupta M. Dens invagination: A review of literature and report of two cases. J Nat Sc Biol Med 2014;5:218-21 |
How to cite this URL:
Thakur S, Thakur NS, Bramta M, Gupta M. Dens invagination: A review of literature and report of two cases. J Nat Sc Biol Med [serial online] 2014 [cited 2021 Feb 28];5:218-21. Available from: http://www.jnsbm.org/text.asp?2014/5/1/218/127341 |
| Introduction | |  |
Dens invaginatus is a developmental anomaly resulting from the invaginations of the enamel organ into the dental papilla during the soft tissue stage of development. As the hard tissues are formed, the invaginated enamel organ produces a small tooth within the future pulp chamber. Dens invagination in a human tooth was first described by a dentist named 'Socrates' in 1856. [1]
Etiology
The etiology of dens invaginatus malformation is controversial and remains unclear. Over the last decades, several theories have been proposed to explain the etiology of dental coronal invaginations
Kronfeld (1934) suggested that the invagination results from a focal failure of growth of the internal enamel epithelium while the surrounding normal epithelium continues to proliferate and engulf the static area. [2]
Rushton (1937) proposed that the invagination is a result of rapid and aggressive proliferation of a part of the internal enamel epithelium invading the dental papilla. [3]
Oehlers (1957) considered that distortion of the enamel organ during tooth development and subsequent protrusion of a part of the enamel organ will lead to the formation of an enamel-lined channel ending at the cingulum or occasionally at the incisal tip. The latter might be associated with irregular crown form. [4],[5]
Atkinson (1943) suggested that the problem was the result of external forces exerting an effect on the tooth germ during development. [6]
Genetic factor has been proposed to be the cause. [7],[8]
Classification
The first documented attempt to classify dens invaginatus was by Hallet [9] (1953) who suggested the existence of 4 types of invagination based on both clinical and radiographic criteria. Other classifications have also been described involving a variety of criteria and standards. [10],[11] For example, Schulze and Brand [12] (1972) suggested an assessment based on 12 possible variations in clinical and radiographic appearance of the invagination. However, the system described by Oehlers [4] (1957a) appears to be the most widely used, possibly because of its simple nomenclature and ease of application. This system categorizes invaginations into 3 classes as determined by how far they extend radiographically from the crown into the root [Figure 1].
Type I: The invagination is minimal and enamel-lined; it is confined within the crown of the tooth and does not extend beyond the level of the external amelo-cemental junction.
Type II: The invagination is enamel-lined and extends into the pulp chamber, but remains within the root canal with no communication with the periodontal ligament.
Type III A: The invagination extends through the root and communicates laterally with the periodontal ligament space through a pseudo-foramen. There is usually no communication with the pulp, which lies compressed within the root.
Type III B: The invagination extends through the root and communicates with the periodontal ligament at the apical foramen. There is usually no communication with the pulp.
In Type III lesions, any infection within the invagination can lead to an inflammatory response within the periodontal tissues giving rise to a 'peri-invagination periodontitis.'
The limitations associated with the use of conventional radiography in the classification and management of dens invaginatus may be overcome in the future with the increasing availability of computerized 3D imaging. [13],[14] Currently, such clinical techniques do not provide images of sufficient quality to fully evaluate the morphology of an invagination in situ although for extracted teeth sufficient detail can be obtained.
Prevalence and distribution
The reported prevalence of adult teeth affected with dens invaginatus is between 0.3% and 10% with the problem observed in 0.25% to 26.1% of individuals examined [Table 1].
| Case Reports | | |
Case report 1
A 12-year-old boy reported with a chief complaint of pain with respect to upper anterior tooth since 3 days. The patient was in good general health. Extra-oral examination revealed no significant findings. Intra-oral examination revealed a comparatively wider maxillary right central incisor with a deep anatomic pit on palatal surface [Figure 2]. The tooth was tender on percussion and did not respond to thermal and electric stimuli. The periapical radiograph revealed type II DI with open apex and periapical pathology with respect to maxillary right central incisor [Figure 3]. Endodontic treatment was started immediately. | Figure 2: Palatal surface of maxillary right central incisor of fi rst case
Click here to view |
 | Figure 3: Periapical view of dens invaginatus Type II in maxillary right central incisor
Click here to view |
Case report 2
A 10-year-old boy reported with a chief complaint of non-eruption upper right anterior tooth. The patient was in good general health. Extra-oral examination revealed no significant findings. Intra-oral examination showed fibrotic gingival eruption bulge of maxillary left lateral incisor. The periapical radiograph showed type III DI with respect to unerupted maxillary left lateral incisor [Figure 4]. Keeping in view the age of the patient and that the contralateral maxillary right lateral incisor was erupted well, it was decided that an incision should be made on the eruption bulge. The incision was made, and patient was reviewed after 1 month. After eruption, the prophylactic composite sealant was applied on the invagination. | Figure 4: Periapical view of dens invaginatus Type III in maxillary left lateral incisor
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
In most cases, a dens invaginatus is detected by chance on the radiograph. Clinically, unusual crown morphology ('dilated,' 'peg-shaped,' 'barrel-shaped') or a deep foramen coecum may be important hints, but affected teeth also may show no clinical signs of the malformation. As pulpal involvement of teeth with coronal invaginations may occur a short time after tooth eruption, an early diagnosis is mandatory to instigate preventive treatment. [31]
In the first case report, there was unusual crown morphology of the tooth with pulpal involvement, whereas the second case was detected radiographically in the unerupted tooth.
The invagination allows entry of irritants into an area, which is separated from pulpal tissue by only a thin layer of enamel and dentine and present a predisposition for the development of dental caries. In some cases, the enamel-lining is incomplete. Channels may also exist between the invagination and the pulp. [3],[32] Therefore, pulp necrosis often occurs rather early, within a few years of eruption, sometimes even before root end closure. [19],[33],[34] Other reported sequelae of undiagnosed and untreated coronal invaginations are abscess formation, [35],[36] retention of neighboring teeth, [37],[38] cysts, [35] and internal resorption. [39]
The treatments options are; prophylactic or preventive sealing of the invagination, [40],[41] root canal treatment, [42] endodontic apical surgery, [43],[44] intentional replantation, [45] and extraction. [46]
In the first case, endodontic management is required, which includes apexification followed by obturation of the tooth, whereas in the second case, prophylactic sealing of the invagination was done after the eruption of the tooth.
| Conclusion | | |
The knowledge of classification and anatomic variations of teeth with dens invaginatus is important for early detection and early management for the practitioners.
| References | | |
| 1. | Shulze C. Developmental abnormalities of the teeth and the jaws. In: Gorlin O, Goldman H, editors. Thoma's Oral Pathology. St.Louis; Mosby: 1970. p. 96-183. 
|
| 2. | Kronfeld R. Dens in dente. J Dent Res 1934;14:49-66.
|
| 3. | Rushton MA. A collection of dilated composite odontomas. Br Dent J 1937;63:65-85.
|
| 4. | Oehlers FA. Dens invaginatus I. Variations of the invagination process and associated anterior crown forms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1957;10:1204-18.
|
| 5. | Oehlers FA. Dens invaginatus II. Associated posterior crown forms and pathogenesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1957;10:1302-16.
|
| 6. | Atkinson SR. The permanent maxillary lateral incisor. Am J Orthod 1943;29:685-98.
|
| 7. | Hosey MT, Bedi R. Multiple dens invaginatus in two brothers. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:44-7.
|
| 8. | Pokala P, Acs G. A constellation of dental anomalies in a chromosomal deletion syndrome (7q32): Case report. Pediatr Dent 1994;16:306-9.
|
| 9. | Hallet GE. The incidence, nature and clinical significance of palatal invagination in the maxillary incisors teeth. Proc R Soc Med 1953;46:491-9.
|
| 10. | Ulmansky M, Hermel J. Double dens in dente in a single tooth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1964;17:92-7.
|
| 11. | Vincent-Townend J. Dens invaginatus. J Dent 1974;2:234-8.
|
| 12. | Schulze C, Brand E. Uber den dens invaginatus (Dens in dente). ZWR 1972;81:569-73.
|
| 13. | Vannier MW, Hildebolt CF, Conover G, Knapp RH, Yokoyama-Crothers N, Wang G. Three dimensional dental imaging by spiral CT. A progress report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:561-70.
|
| 14. | Sponchiado EC Jr, Ismail HA, Braga MR, de Carvalho FK, Simoes CA. Maxillary central incisor with two root canals: A case report. J Endod 2006;32:1002-4.
|
| 15. | Muhlreiter E. Die natur der anomalen hohlenbildung imoberen Seitenschneidezahne. Deutsche vierteljahresschrift für zahnilkunde 1873;13:367-72.
|
| 16. | Boyne PJ. Dens in dente: Report of three cases. J Am Dent Assoc 1952;45:208-9.
|
| 17. | Shafer WG. Dens in dente. NY State Dent J 1953;19:220-5.
|
| 18. | Amos ER. Incidence of the small dens in dente. J Am Dent Assoc 1955;51:31-3.
|
| 19. | Poyton HG, Morgan GA. Densin dente. Dent Radiogr Photogr 1966;39:27-33.
|
| 20. | Miyoshi S, Fujiwara J, Nakata T, Yamamoto K, Deguchi K. Dens invaginatus in Japanese incisors. Shika Kiso Igakkai Zasshi 1971;13:539-44.
|
| 21. | Fujiki Y, Tamaki N, Kawahara K, Nabae M. Clinical and radiographic observations of dens invaginatus. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1974;3:343-8.
|
| 22. | Thomas JG. A study of dens in dente. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;38:653-5.
|
| 23. | Gotoh T, Kawahara K, Imai K, Kishi K, Fujiki Y. Clinical and radiographic study of dens invaginatus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1979;48:88-91.
|
| 24. | Ruprecht A, Batniji S, Sastry KA, El-Neweihi E. The incidence of dental invagination. J Pedod 1986;10:265-72.
|
| 25. | Ruprecht A, Sastry KA, Batniji S, Lambourne A. The clinical significance of dental invagination. J Pedod 1987;11:176-81.
|
| 26. | Thongudomporn U, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Aust Dent J 1998;43:395-8.
|
| 27. | Backman B, Wahlin YB. Variations in number and morphology of permanent teeth in 7-year-old Swedish children. Int J Paediat Dent 2001;11:11-7.
|
| 28. | Hamasha AA, Al-Omari QD. Prevalence of dens invaginatus in Jordanian adults. Int Endod J 2004;37:307-10.
|
| 29. | Ezoddini AF, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: A radiographic study. Community Dent Health 2007;24:140-4.
|
| 30. | Cakici F, Celiekoglu M, Arslan H, Topcuoglu HS, Erdogan AS. Assessment of the prevalence and characteristics of dens invaginatus in a sample of Turkish Anatolian population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:e855-8.
|
| 31. | Hu lsmann M. Dens invaginatus: Aetiology, classification, prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment considerations. Int Endod J 1997;30:79-90.
|
| 32. | Stamfelj I, Kansky AA, Gaspersic D. Unusual variant of type 3 dens invaginatus in a maxillary canine: A rare case report. J Endod 2007;33:64-8.
|
| 33. | Hitchin AD, MCHugh WD. Three coronal invaginations in a dilated composite odontome. Br Dent J 1954;97:90-2.
|
| 34. | Greenfeld RS, Cambruzzi JV. Complexities of endodontic treatment of maxillary lateral incisors with anomalous root formation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;62:82-8.
|
| 35. | Nik-Hussein NN. Dens invaginatus: Complications and treatment of non-vital infected tooth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1994;18:303-6.
|
| 36. | Chen RJ, Yang JF, Chao TC. Invaginated tooth associated with periodontal abscess. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;69:659.
|
| 37. | Whyman RA, Macfadyen EE. Dens in dente associated with infective endocarditis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:47-50.
|
| 38. | Conklin WW. Double bilateral dens invaginatus in the maxillary incisor region. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1975;39:949-52.
|
| 39. | Mader C. Triple dens in dente. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977;44:966.
|
| 40. | Shapiro L. Dens in dente. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970;30:782.
|
| 41. | Aguiar CM, Ferreira JP, Câmara AC, de Figueiredo JA. Type 2 dens invaginatus in a maxillary lateral incisor: A case report of a conventional endodontic treatment. J Clin Pediatric Dent 2008;33:103-6.
|
| 42. | Steffen H, Splieth C. Conventional treatment of dens invaginatus in maxillary lateral incisor with sinus tract: One year follow-up. J Endod 2005;31:130-3.
|
| 43. | Ortiz P, Weisleder R, Villareal de Justus Y. Combined therapy in the treatment of dens invaginatus: Case report. J Endod 2004;30:672-4.
|
| 44. | Nallapati S. Clinical management of a maxillary Lateral incisor with vital pulp and type III dens iinvaginatus; a case report. J Endod 2004;30:726-31.
|
| 45. | Nedley MP, Power GK. Intentional extraction and reimplantationof an immature invaginated central incisor. ASDC J Dent Child 1997;64:417-20.
|
| 46. | Girsch WJ, Mc Clammy TV. Microscopic removal of dens invaginatus. J Endod 2002;28:336-9.
|
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Anterior fiber-reinforced ribbon composite resin bridge-A case report |
|
| Valentina Pankratz,Stefan Zimmer,Ljubia Markovic | | Clinical Case Reports. 2018; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Prophylactic treatment dens invaginatus (type 1): An uncommon presentation |
|
| O. Marouane,S. Zouiten,A. Boughzala | | Journal of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene. 2016; 8(10): 66 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Double Dens Invaginatus with Multiple Canals in a Maxillary Central Incisor: Retreatment and Managing Complications |
|
| Asma Zoya,Sajid Ali,Sharique Alam,Rajendra K. Tewari,Surendra K. Mishra,Ashok Kumar,Syed Mukhtar-Un-Nisar Andrabi | | Journal of Endodontics. 2015; 41(11): 1927 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Diagnosis and endodontic treatment of type II dens invaginatus by using cone-beam computed tomography and splint guides for cavity access |
|
| Álvaro Zubizarreta Macho,Alberto Ferreiroa,Cristina Rico-Romano,Luis Óscar Alonso-Ezpeleta,Jesús Mena-Álvarez | | The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2015; 146(4): 266 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
