Table of Contents    
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 94-96  

Peripheral ossifying fibroma

1 Department of Periodontics, Himachal Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Paonta Sahib, Dist: Sirmour, India
2 Department of Oral Pathology, HP Govt. Dental College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
3 BK Civil Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India
4 Department of Periodontics, Teerthankar Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication9-May-2012

Correspondence Address:
Parveen Dahiya
Department of Periodontics, Himachal Institute of Dental Sciences and research, Paonta Sahib, Dist: Sirmour 173 025, Himachal Pradesh
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.95983

Rights and Permissions

A case of peripheral ossifying fibroma (POF) in the mandibular gingiva of a 17-year-old male is described. The lesion was asymptomatic, firm, pink, and present on the lingual alveolar mucosa interdentally between 43 and 44. Radiographic investigations revealed no significant findings. Excisional biopsy was performed for the lesion. Microscopic findings confirmed the diagnosis of POF.

Keywords: Gingiva, mandibular, peripheral ossifying fibroma

How to cite this article:
Dahiya P, Kamal R, Saini G, Agarwal S. Peripheral ossifying fibroma. J Nat Sc Biol Med 2012;3:94-6

How to cite this URL:
Dahiya P, Kamal R, Saini G, Agarwal S. Peripheral ossifying fibroma. J Nat Sc Biol Med [serial online] 2012 [cited 2021 Jul 29];3:94-6. Available from:

   Introduction Top

Peripheral ossifying fibroma (POF) is a relatively uncommon gingival growth. [1] POF accounts for 3% of all oral tumors [2] and for 9.6% of all gingival lesions. [3]

The POF mainly affects women in the second decade of life. The lesions are most often found in gingiva, located anterior to molars and in the maxilla. Clinically, it manifests as a slow growing gingival mass measuring approx. 2 cm in size and is located in the interdental papilla region. The base may be sessile or pedunculated, the color is identical to that of gingiva or slightly reddish or the surface may appear ulcerated. [4]

Histologically, the POF consists of a fibrocellular component with focal deposits of bone, some cementum as well as irregular amounts of decalcification. A chronic inflammatory infiltrate is commonly seen around the periphery of the lesion. [5] In vast majority of the cases, there is no apparent underlying bone involvement visible on a roentgenogram. However on rare occasions, there does appear to be superficial erosion of bone. [6]

Prognosis is good, but some instances of recurrence have been reported regularly in various studies. Incidences of recurrence have been put at 16-20% by various studies. [7],[8] The reasons for recurrence include (a) incomplete removal of lesion, (b) failure to eliminate local irritants, and (c) difficulty in access during surgical manipulation due to intricate location of POF being present usually at interdental areas. Deep excisions have been preferred as interjection to these recurrences. [9]

   Case Report Top

A 17-year-old male patient reported to the Department of Periodontics with the chief complaint of swelling in the lower right back tooth region. The patient noticed the small swelling 1 year back which gradually increased to the present size. Past medical history and family history were not significant.

Extraoral examination revealed no significant findings. Intraoral examination revealed a single, well-defined painless, roughly oval swelling measuring 1.5 × 1 cm, firm in consistency on the lingual alveolar mucosa interdentally between 43 and 44 [Figure 1]. The surface of the swelling was smooth with no secondary changes and discharge.
Figure 1: Intraoral clinical picture

Click here to view

Radiographic examination revealed no bone loss. However, elongation of root in relation to 43 was observed [Figure 2]. Differential diagnosis of fibroma, pyogenic granuloma, POF, and peripheral giant cell granuloma was made after clinical and radiographic examination.
Figure 2: Intraoral periapical radiograph

Click here to view

Excisional biopsy was performed, and the specimen was sent for histopathological examination. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of POF [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Microscopic picture (×10)

Click here to view

   Discussion Top

Intraoral ossifying fibromas have been described in the literature since the late 1940s. Many names have been given to similar lesions, such as epulis, peripheral fibroma with calcification, POF, calcifying fibroblastic granuloma, peripheral cementifying fibroma, peripheral fibroma with cementogenesis, and peripheral cemento-ossifying fibroma. The sheer number of names used for fibroblastic gingival lesions indicates that there is much controversy surrounding the classification of these lesions. [10]

The POF mainly affects women in the second decade of life. The lesions are most often found in gingiva, located anterior to molars and in the maxilla. However in our case, it was present in the mandibular region of a male patient.

Two schools of thought have been preferred to explain the histogenesis. The first group of researchers believed that POF develops from cells of periodontal ligament/periosteum, which has been accepted by many. The widely accepted etiopathogenesis for POF is the inflammatory hyperplasia of the cells of the periosteum or periodontal ligament, as there is excessive proliferation of mature fibrous connective tissue in response to gingival injury, gingival irritation, subgingival calculus or a foreign body in the gingival sulcus. Chronic irritation of the periosteal and periodontal membrane causes metaplasia of the connective tissue and resultant initiation of formation of bone or dystrophic calcification. [11] Eversole and Rovin stated that the constant irritation present during exfoliation of the deciduous teeth and eruption of the permanent teeth may result in an increased incidence of reactive lesions which originate from the periodontal ligament. [12]

The second group of researchers believe that POF lesions were simply a more mature variant of pyogenic granuloma. They state that POF might have developed initially as PG and subsequent maturation led to the ossification of the lesion. Thus, these two lesions represent the progressive stages of the same spectrum of pathosis. [13]

   References Top

1.Walters JD, Will JK, Hatfield RD, Cacchillo DA, Raabe DA. Excision and repair of the peripheral ossifying fibroma: A report of 3 cases. J Periodontol 2001;72:939-44.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Bhaskar SN, Lenin HP. Histopathology of the human gingiva (study based on 1269 biopsies). J Periodontol 1973;44:3-17.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Stablein MJ, Silverglade LB. Comparative analysis of biopsy specimens from gingival and alveolar mucosa. J Periodontol 1985;56:671-6   Back to cited text no. 3
4.Marx RE, Stern D. Oral and maxillofacial pathology: A rationale for diagnosis and management. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co.; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Zhang W, Chen Y, An Z, Geng N, Ba OD. Reactive gingival lesions: A retrospective study of 2,439 cases. Quintessence Int 2007;38:103-10.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Das UM, Azher U. Peripheral Ossifying Fibroma. J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent 2009;27:49-51.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Lee KW. The fibrous epulis and related lesions- Granuloma pyogenicum, pregnancy tumor, fibro-epithelial polyp and calcifying fibroblastic granuloma- A clinic-pathological study. Periodontics 1968;6:277-92.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Gundiff EJ. Peripheral Ossifying Fibroma. A review of 365 cases. Thesis Indiana University. 1972.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Shetty DC, Urs AB, Ahuja P, Sahu A, Manchanda A, Sirohi Y. Mineralised components and their interpretation in the histogenesis of POF. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:56-61.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
10.Gardener DG. The peripheral odontogenic fibroma: An attempt at clarification. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;54:40.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Yadav R, Gulati A. Peripheral ossifying fibroma: A case report. J Oral Sci 2009;51:151-4.   Back to cited text no. 11
12.Eversole LR, Rovin S. Reactive lesions of the gingival. J Oral Pathol 1972;1:30-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
13.Prasad S, Reddy SB, Patil SR, Kulburgi NB, Puranik RS. Peripheral Ossifying fibroma and pyogenic granuloma. Are they interrelated. N York S Dent J 2008;74:50-2.  Back to cited text no. 13


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]

This article has been cited by
1 An update on peripheral ossifying fibroma: case report and literature review
María José Franco-Barrera,María Guadalupe Zavala-Cerna,Rubén Fernández-Tamayo,Israel Vivanco-Pérez,Nora Mariana Fernández-Tamayo,Olivia Torres-Bugarín
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016; 20(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Commentary on: “An update on peripheral ossifying fibroma: case report and literature review”
Ebtissam Alerraqi
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
   Case Report
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded439    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal