Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 4: (a) Evaluation of different carbohydrates supplemented with sugar as snail attractant feed. Values are mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 10). *P < 0.05 compared with rice. (b) Evaluation of the combination of carbohydrates as snail attractant feed. (c) Evaluation of combined carbohydrates feed supplemented with different protein hydrolysates. RSW: Rice + 5% sugar and 15% wheat. **P < 0.01 compare with RSW + Yeast extract 0.5%; ##P < 0.001 compare with RSW + Chicken feather hydrolysate 0.5%, and (d) Consumption of different carbohydrates feed supplemented with fishmeal by snails. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 compare with rice

Figure 4: (a) Evaluation of different carbohydrates supplemented with sugar as snail attractant feed. Values are mean ± standard error of the mean (<i>n</i> = 10). *<i>P</i> < 0.05 compared with rice. (b) Evaluation of the combination of carbohydrates as snail attractant feed. (c) Evaluation of combined carbohydrates feed supplemented with different protein hydrolysates. RSW: Rice + 5% sugar and 15% wheat. **<i>P</i> < 0.01 compare with RSW + Yeast extract 0.5%; ##<i>P</i> < 0.001 compare with RSW + Chicken feather hydrolysate 0.5%, and (d) Consumption of different carbohydrates feed supplemented with fishmeal by snails. **<i>P</i> < 0.01; ***<i>P</i> < 0.001 compare with rice