Year : 2019  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 158-162

Outcomes and complications of cataract surgery in Indonesia: A multicentric study

1 General Practitioner, Hadji Boejasin Pelaihari General Hospital, Tanah Laut, South Kalimantan, Indonesia
2 General Practitioner, Surya Husadha Nusa Dua Hospital, Badung, Bali, Indonesia
3 General Practitioner, Bhakti Rahayu Tabanan General Hospital, Tabanan, Bali, Indonesia
4 General Practitioner, Dr. Suyoto Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
5 General Practitioner, Tani dan Nelayan General Hospital, Boalemo, Gorontalo, Indonesia
6 General Practitioner, dr. Loekmono Hadi General Hospital, Kudus, Central Java, Indonesia
7 Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Cipto Mangunkusumo HospitalKirana, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Correspondence Address:
Nur Aisyah Rahmawati
General Practitioner, Hadji Boejasin Pelaihari General Hospital, Tanah Laut, South Kalimantan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_63_19

Rights and Permissions

Objective: Cataract is the leading cause of blindness worldwide and its only treatment is surgery, which is intended to restore the visual function; the expected outcomes are improved visual acuity (VA) and elimination of blindness. Therefore, evaluation of the outcomes of cataract surgery is needed to improve the quality of treatment programs. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 193 postcataract surgery eyes from August 2017 to March 2018 in six hospitals in Indonesia. Convenience sampling was used. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the medical records of pre- and postoperative VA, types of surgery, and complications.Results: Of the 193 eyes, 170 were analyzed. Phacoemulsification, manual small-incision cataract surgery, and extracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were performed in 45.3%, 51.2%, and 3.5% of eyes, respectively. Preoperatively, 70% were blind, 8.8% had severe visual impairment (SVI), 17.1% had moderate visual impairment (MVI), and 4.1% were normal. Postoperatively, 78.2% were normal, 15.3% had MVI, 2.4% had SVI, and 4.1% were still blind. There were 93.5% of eyes with visual improvement; the blindness conversion rate was 95%. The overall complication rate was 15.3%, mostly from corneal edema (7.1%), followed by IOL dislocation (1.8%) and endophthalmitis (1.2%). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative visual outcome between groups treated with or without phacoemulsification (P = 0.870), but complications from corneal edema were statistically significantly higher with phacoemulsification (P = 0.003). Conclusion: All types of cataract surgery significantly improved VA, but the complication rate was higher with phacoemulsification, mostly from corneal edema.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded50    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal