|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 67-70
Natural sweeteners as fixatives in histopathology: A longitudinal study
Shankargouda Patil, Roopa S Rao, BS Ganavi, Barnali Majumdar
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, MSR Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
|Date of Web Publication||14-Jan-2015|
Dr. Shankargouda Patil
Department of Oral Pathology & Microbiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, MSR Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India - 560054
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Fixation is the essential step in histopathological processing of tissues. Since formalin is a corroborated biohazard, its routine use as a fixative is a major health and safety concern and hence the quest for safer alternatives is envisaged. Natural sweeteners like jaggery and honey have proved to be effective tissue preservatives over 24 h. This pioneer eco-idea needs further research to expand its application. Aim: (1) To evaluate the fixative property of jaggery and honey over 6 months and ascertaining the results using hematoxylin and eosin stain (H and E). (2) To evaluate the compatibility of jaggery and honey fixed tissues for special stains - Periodic acid Schiff (PAS) and Masson-Trichrome (MT). Materials and Methods: Equal bits of commercially available animal mucosae were preserved in 30% jaggery, 20% honey, and 10% buffered formalin (control) over 6 months at intervals. Following which, tissues were subjected to routine H and E, special stains - PAS and MT using standard operating procedures established in our group. Results: Formalin, jaggery, and honey yielded satisfactory results post 6 months for H and E and special stains, jaggery was comparable to formalin in tissue preservation. Conclusion: We propose the use of eco-friendly jaggery and honey as alternatives to formalin for long term tissue preservation.
Keywords: Formalin, honey, jaggery, natural fixatives, tissue preservation
|How to cite this article:|
Patil S, Rao RS, Ganavi B S, Majumdar B. Natural sweeteners as fixatives in histopathology: A longitudinal study. J Nat Sc Biol Med 2015;6:67-70
|How to cite this URL:|
Patil S, Rao RS, Ganavi B S, Majumdar B. Natural sweeteners as fixatives in histopathology: A longitudinal study. J Nat Sc Biol Med [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Apr 2];6:67-70. Available from: http://www.jnsbm.org/text.asp?2015/6/1/67/149089
| Introduction|| |
Formalin is traditionally a popular and widely used fixative for histopathology processing of tissues due to its ease, economic viability, fairly fast fixation, effortless processing and an array of histologic techniques that can be performed postfixation. Routine histologic staining methods employed in laboratories are based on the use of formalin fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.  Despite these advantages, the health and safety risks associated with formalin use is a concern. Screening out regrettable substitutes, a handful of synthetic options like alcoholic fixatives, fixatives for nucleic acids, nonalcoholic substitutes, and fixatives with <10% of formalin are commercially available.  Natural fixatives such as honey, sugar, and jaggery are evaluated by our group as a potential alternative to formalin use.  Interestingly, among these natural fixatives, jaggery syrup has shown better utility as a fixative over a 24 h period, when compared with the reliable honey.  The goal of the present study was to evaluate the fixative property of jaggery and honey over a 6 months period and compare it with formalin as control using quality of H and E, Periodic acid Schiff (PAS), and Masson-Trichrome (MT) staining as benchmark.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The materials and method adopted is summarized in Flowchart 1.
The histomorphological criteria employed are indicated in [Table 1]. 30% jaggery, 20% honey, and 10% buffered formalin were used. Results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test. Inter-observer variability was determined by Kappa statistics.
| Results|| |
Formalin fixation for 48 h resulted in significantly better results when compared to honey and jaggery. However, the quality of fixation could not be assured as the tissues fixed by all three fixatives gradually deteriorated over a period of time. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test revealed no significant difference between the three fixatives by the end of 5 th month. Further at the end of 6 th month, all the three fixatives demonstrated similar results, with jaggery being comparable to formalin in H and E [Graph 1],
PAS and MT [Graph 2]
stained sections. Kappa value of 0.563 suggested moderate agreement between observers.
| Discussion|| |
Although formalin is the gold standard fixative in routine histopathology, a search for its alternative actively explored, primarily due to its adverse effects on health. Recently, the potential carcinogenicity of formaldehyde has been emphasized. , The International Agency for Research on Cancer has sufficient evidence for the carcinogenicity of formaldehyde in humans, and hence categorized formaldehyde as carcinogenic.  Repeated exposure or prolonged inhalation of formaldehyde in occupational settings is a causative irritant of the mucous membrane of eyes, nose, mouth and upper respiratory tract,  which has potential health hazards. 
Non-formalin fixatives either contain an aldehyde component other than formaldehyde or do not contain an aldehyde component; thereby, avoiding any potential toxic effects.  Currently, the natural substitutes have better scope due to their desirable results. In this regard, honey was the first proven natural fixative evaluated. ,,, Our group has recently reported the effectiveness of jaggery as tissue fixative and its superiority over honey. 
In this study, standardized concentrations of 20% honey and 30% jaggery were taken against 10% formalin as a positive control. All the three reagents were subjected to testing for their efficacy using H and E, PAS, and MT over a period of 6 months. The proposed mechanism of action of honey and jaggery are displayed in Flowchart 2.
 Jaggery and honey maintained the high quality gross anatomy. Further, postfixation macroscopic findings are collated in [Table 2]. and color changes are represented in [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Macroscopic appearance of tissues after 6 months of fixation with: (a) Formalin, (b) jaggery, and (c) honey|
Click here to view
A limitation of honey and jaggery syrup was the growth of molds over a period of time. However, this can be overcome by the addition of thymol crystals. Special attention is required during sectioning of honey and jaggery fixed tissues as they tend to breach due to fragility [Table 3].
|Table 3: Problems encountered with different fixatives with and their remedial measures|
Click here to view
The overall morphology of the tissues fixed in jaggery and honey was relatively intact even at the end of 6 months. However, the cellular and nuclear clarity gradually decreased in all the three fixatives. Evident cellular and nuclear shrinkage was observed with jaggery and honey as compared to formalin during the final stages of the study. Staining properties, although deteriorated, was sufficiently discernible in all the three reagents [Figure 2]. The possible cause for slightly inferior results with jaggery and honey would be due to altered cross binding with the tissue as compared to formalin.
|Figure 2: Photomicrographs of tissues fixed with (a) formalin, (b) jaggery, and (c) honey stained with H and E (×40)|
Click here to view
Jaggery and honey are at an experimental level, and are yet to be on par with formalin, to be used as a fixative in the long run. Nevertheless, at the end of 6 months all the three fixatives were equally good on H and E stained sections. This proves the long-term efficacy of jaggery and honey as tissue preservatives. Except for sectioning difficulties, they performed well in consequent steps of tissue processing [Table 4]. Interestingly, the specificity and staining intensity using PAS and MT on jaggery and honey fixed tissues although adequate was not optimal. Nevertheless, jaggery surmounted honey in all aspects [Figure 3].
|Figure 3: Photomicrographs of tissues fixed with (a) formalin, (b) jaggery, and (c) honey stained with Periodic acid Schiff (×40) and Masson– Trichrome (×10)|
Click here to view
Use of natural alternatives can be attempted in screening camps, as an instant choice for biopsied tissues in private clinics and as a transporting media. This idea can equally be used for preservation of museum specimens, in the forensic field wherein stored tissue has to be occasionally retrieved for histological examination.
| Conclusion|| |
Implementing eco-friendly fixatives in routine histopathology is necessary. Although, extensive research in this field is required, current evidence encourages the use of jaggery and honey as alternatives to formalin. Further, the consistent performance of jaggery and honey identified in our study is a safety milestone to advance the field of histopathology.
| References|| |
Titford ME, Horenstein MG. Histomorphologic assessment of formalin substitute fixatives for diagnostic surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;129:502-6.
Buesa RJ. Histology without formalin? Ann Diagn Pathol 2008;12:387-96.
Patil S, Premalatha B, Rao RS, Ganavi B. Revelation in the field of tissue preservation - A preliminary study on natural formalin substitutes. J Int Oral Health 2013;5:31-8.
Cogliano V, Grosse Y, Baan R, Straif K, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, et al
. Advice on formaldehyde and glycol ethers. Lancet Oncol 2004;5:528.
Cogliano VJ, Grosse Y, Baan RA, Straif K, Secretan MB, El Ghissassi F, et al
. Meeting report: Summary of IARC monographs on formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol, and 1-tert-butoxy-2-propanol. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:1205-8.
Wakefield JC. Formaldehyde - Toxicological overview. London: Health Protection Agency (HPA); 2008.
Toxicological Profile for Formaldehyde. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), US Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, US 1999.
Lassalle S, Hofman V, Marius I, Gavric-Tanga V, Brest P, Havet K, et al
. Assessment of morphology, antigenicity, and nucleic acid integrity for diagnostic thyroid pathology using formalin substitute fixatives. Thyroid 2009;19:1239-48.
Ozkan N, Salva E, Cakalaðaoðlu F, Tüzüner B. Honey as a substitute for formalin? Biotech Histochem 2012;87:148-53.
Gunter M, Bryant P. Immunohistochemical evaluation of ductal carcinoma in breast after preservation in honey. J Histotechnol 2009;32:54-9.
AI-Maaini R, Bryant P. The effectiveness of honey as a substitute for formalin in the histological fixation of tissue. J Histotechnol 2006;29:173-6.
AI-Maaini R, Bryant P. Honey as an alternative to formalin in the demonstration of connective tissue components. J Histotechnol 2008;31:67-72.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]