Table of Contents    
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 198-201  

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenter Gram-negative clinical isolates of microbial resource orchid


1 Department of Microbiology, Drug Discovery Research, Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Sholinganallur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Biotechnology, School of Biotechnology, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Date of Web Publication14-Jan-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Maneesh Paul-Satyaseela
Department of Microbiology, Drug Discovery Research, Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd., 476/14, OMR, Sholinganallur, Chennai - 600 119, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.149121

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Microbial resource orchid is a collection of Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates sourced from different hospitals and diagnostic laboratories in India. We determined the antibiotic susceptibility of a set of Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenter clinical isolates from microbial resource orchid, collected during the period of 2002-2012 against commonly used antibiotics. Materials and Methods: A total of 247 Gram negative strains consisting of 142 Enterobacteriaceae and 105 non-fermenters from microbial resource orchid were selected for determining minimum inhibitory concentration against β-lactams, aminoglycosides, quinolone, and tetracycline by agar dilution method as per clinical and laboratory standards institute guidelines. Results: All the isolates had high resistance to ampicillin, piperacillin, ceftazidime, gentamicin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin. Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed moderate resistance to carbapenems. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the high level of antibiotic resistance among the strains collected under microbial resource orchid and further, such data and the strains can be used in new chemical entities profiling.

Keywords: Antibiotic susceptibility, antibiotic resistance, Gram-negative clinical isolates, minimum inhibitory concentration


How to cite this article:
Hariharan P, Bharani T, Franklyne JS, Biswas P, Solanki SS, Paul-Satyaseela M. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenter Gram-negative clinical isolates of microbial resource orchid. J Nat Sc Biol Med 2015;6:198-201

How to cite this URL:
Hariharan P, Bharani T, Franklyne JS, Biswas P, Solanki SS, Paul-Satyaseela M. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenter Gram-negative clinical isolates of microbial resource orchid. J Nat Sc Biol Med [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 May 26];6:198-201. Available from: http://www.jnsbm.org/text.asp?2015/6/1/198/149121


   Introduction Top


There is a constant global increase in the prevalence of Gram-negative infections especially in the Intensive Care Units (ICUs). A multi-national study found that there was a worrisome shift toward Gram-negative infections with 62% of the collected microbial isolates from ICUs. [1] Infectious Diseases Society of America has highlighted a faction of antibiotic resistant bacteria Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp., [2] which predominantly consist of Gram-negative bacteria.

Multi-drug resistance to commonly used antibiotics among clinically important Gram-negative pathogens is on the rise. The production of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) or AmpC-type β-lactamase by these pathogens causes resistance to most β-lactam antibiotics and is often associated with resistance to aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. [3] Carbapenems have been the last resort in treatment of serious multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, there is an increase in carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa and emergence of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. [4],[5],[6]

Antibiotic susceptibility data of clinical isolates are helpful to understand the epidemiology of antibiotic resistant bacteria and to choose the effective antibiotic for treating such pathogens. In addition, a collection of such isolates are useful in evaluating antibacterial potency of pipeline new chemical entities (NCEs) in discovery research. Orchid sources different Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates from various hospitals and diagnostic laboratories in India and maintains it under the name of microbial resource orchid. These isolates are maintained for the purpose of evaluating potential antibacterial NCEs. Before such evaluation, susceptibility pattern of these isolates to commonly used antibiotics should be identified. In the present study, we determined the antibiotic susceptibility of a set of Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenter clinical isolates from microbial resource orchid, collected during the period of 2002-2012 against commonly used antibiotics.


   Materials and Methods Top


Bacterial isolates

A selected set of Gram-negative clinical isolates from microbial resource orchid collection, comprising of  Escherichia More Details coli (n = 58), Klebsiella sp., (n = 58) Enterobacter sp., (n = 26) P. aeruginosa (n = 83), and A. baumannii (n = 22) were included in the study. These isolates were sourced from several tertiary hospitals in India and were isolated from wound swab, pus, vaginal swab, urine, ear swab, sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchial lavage, catheter tip, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid. These isolates were speciated with the MiniAPI automated culture identification system (BioMerieux, France) and were preserved in brain heart infusion (BHI) (BD, USA) broth containing 20% glycerol at −80°C. Isolates were revived on BHI agar plates that were incubated overnight at 37°C. On the day of the experiment, to obtain log phase in broth, cultures were inoculated into BHI broth and incubated at 37°C for 4-6 h. E. coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were the quality control strains used in the study.

Antibiotics


Various antibiotics included in the study were sourced from commercial batches belonging to β-lactam, aminoglycoside, quinolone, and tetracycline classes and β-lactamase inhibitors (BLI).

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibiotics and β-lactam/BLI combinations (ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, and ceftazidime/tazobactam) was determined by agar dilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. [7] Mueller - Hinton agar (MHA) (BD, USA) plates, each containing a doubling concentrations of antibiotics were prepared. Tazobactam was combined at a fixed concentration of 4 mg/L and ampicillin/sulbactam was added at 2:1 ratio. The MHA plates were inoculated with cultures diluted to approximately 10 4 CFU/spot. MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of the drug which inhibited the visible growth of the isolates after an incubation period of 18 h at 37°C.


   Results Top


The percentage of antibiotic resistance in microbial resource orchid clinical isolates is represented in [Table 1] and [Table 2]. The percentage resistance was determined based on both CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. For the interpretation of data and discussion, we followed CLSI breakpoints as these are widely followed.
Table 1: Percentage resistance in Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates

Click here to view
Table 2: Percentage resistance in non-fermenters clinical isolates

Click here to view


Escherichia coli isolates showed higher level of resistance to ampicillin (82.8%) followed by ciprofloxacin (77.6%) and tetracycline (72.4%). In addition, there was a significant resistance observed against piperacillin (50%), gentamicin (48.3%), and ceftazidime (34.5%). Meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and ceftazidime/tazobactam showed no resistance.

In Klebsiella sp., a high level of resistance to ampicillin (93.1%) followed by resistance to piperacillin and gentamicin (50%); ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline (36-41%) was observed. There was a marginal resistance to ceftazidime/tazobactam (5.2%) and piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem (1.7%). Similar trend was observed in Enterobacter sp., except that, there was a moderate resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime/tazobactam (11.5%).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates showed significant to moderate resistance to all the tested drugs. There was a significant resistance to tetracycline (85.5%), followed by ciprofloxacin, tobramycin and gentamicin (49-56%); piperacillin and ceftazidime (32%) and moderate resistance to imipenem (15.7%) and meropenem (9.6%). A. baumannii exhibited resistance to ciprofloxacin (54.5%), piperacillin, ceftazidime, gentamicin (50%), tobramycin (45.5%), tetracycline, and cefepime (40.9%).

With respect to multi-drug resistance among the microbial resource orchid clinical isolates, about 30% of Klebsiella sp. were resistant to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline. Both P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii had a similar level of multi-drug (piperacillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline) resistant phenotypes [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Percentage of multi-drug resistance in Enterobacteriaceaea and nonfermentersb. aResistant to ampicillin, ciprofl oxacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline, bResistant to piperacillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The susceptibility data of microbial resource orchid Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenter clinical isolates demonstrated remarkable resistance to commonly used antibiotics.

In Enterobacteriaceae, there was a significant resistance to β-lactams (except cefepime and meropenem), ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline. In addition, notable percentages of the isolates were multi-drug resistant. Similar resistance pattern among Indian Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates have been widely reported. [8] In the present study, tazobactam, an inhibitor of β-lactamases including ESBLs was combined with ceftazidime to assess the prevalence of ESBL producers. Among ceftazidime resistant isolates, all E. coli and majority of Klebsiella and Enterobacter were susceptible to ceftazidime combined with tazobactam suggesting that they were ESBL producers.

Another important finding of the study was carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa isolates. Apart from resistance displayed against piperacillin, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin, there was a notable resistance to both imipenem and meropenem. Since both these agents have been the last resort in treatment of serious P. aeruginosa infections in hospitals, increased resistance to them requires serious attention. Combining tazobactam to piperacillin and ceftazidime against their resistance strains did not significantly reduce the resistance level suggesting such strains possessed either AmpC β-lactamase or non β-lactamase mediated resistance mechanisms. In addition, there was significant multi-drug resistance both in P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii.

Inappropriate and overuse of antibiotics has been implicated for antibiotic resistance development in bacterial pathogens. [9] This study and other published studies showed that the initial choice of treatment of antibiotic resistant Gram-negative infections is carbapenems. [10] However, there has been the emergence of resistance to carbapenems, [11] which was also observed in the present study. Hence, implementing policy for rational use of antibiotics is essential to minimize the emergence and spread of resistance. In addition, there is an urgent need for generating pipeline NCEs which are effective against multi-drug resistant pathogens. By representing current epidemiological pattern, microbial resource orchid isolates can be used in evaluating antibacterial potency and spectrum of pipeline NCEs in discovery research.


   Acknowledgments Top


We acknowledge Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Limited, for providing the financial support.

 
   References Top

1.
Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, Silva E, Anzueto A, Martin CD, et al. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA 2009;302:2323-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Pendleton JN, Gorman SP, Gilmore BF. Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2013;11:297-308.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kallen AJ, Hidron AI, Patel J, Srinivasan A. Multidrug resistance among gram-negative pathogens that caused healthcare-associated infections reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2006-2008. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:528-31.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Castanheira M, Bell JM, Turnidge JD, Mathai D, Jones RN. Carbapenem resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from India: Evidence for nationwide endemicity of multiple metallo-β-lactamase clones (VIM-2, -5, -6, and -11 and the newly characterized VIM-18). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:1225-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Gupta N, Limbago BM, Patel JB, Kallen AJ. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Epidemiology and prevention. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:60-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Nordmann P, Naas T, Poirel L. Global spread of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17:1791-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 18 th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S18. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Sarma JB, Bhattacharya PK, Kalita D, Rajbangshi M. Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae including metallo-ß-lactamase producers are predominant pathogens of healthcare-associated infections in an Indian teaching hospital. Indian J Med Microbiol 2011;29:22-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
9.
English BK, Gaur AH. The use and abuse of antibiotics and the development of antibiotic resistance. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010;659:73-82.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Rahal JJ. The role of carbapenems in initial therapy for serious Gram-negative infections. Crit Care 2008;12 Suppl 4:S5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Gupta E, Mohanty S, Sood S, Dhawan B, Das BK, Kapil A. Emerging resistance to carbapenems in a tertiary care hospital in north India. Indian J Med Res 2006;124:95-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 In vitro antibacterial activity of plumbagin isolated from Plumbago zeylanica L. against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
H. Periasamy,S. Iswarya,N. Pavithra,S. Senthilnathan,A. Gnanamani
Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 The occurrence of blaTEM, blaSHV and blaOXA genotypes in Extended-Spectrum -Lactamase (ESBL)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in Southwest of Iran
Ali Nazari Alam,Jamal Sarvari,Mohammad Motamedifar,Hossein Khoshkharam,Masoud Yousefi,Rezvan Moniri,Abdollah Bazargani
Gene Reports. 2018; 13: 19
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 In vitroprofiling of antimethicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusactivity of thymoquinone against selected type and clinical strains
P. Hariharan,M. Paul-Satyaseela,A. Gnanamani
Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2016; 62(3): 283
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 High incidence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes among ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae at a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, India
Thiyagarajan Yugendran,Belgode Narasimha Harish
PeerJ. 2016; 4: e1995
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1693    
    Printed37    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded243    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal